[identity profile] angevin2.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] thisengland
So I was talking to [livejournal.com profile] faithhopetricks and [livejournal.com profile] speak_me_fair about things that should be done in productions of the histories but never (or rarely) are. (The specific thing that triggered it is that none of us had ever seen a production of the improv scene in 1H4 that took advantage of being in a tetralogy to play up the echoes of Richard II's deposition.)

And from this came the question of things we would totally put in the histories if we were in charge of the Shakespeare world.

I was going to write up my own list to start, but it would take me about three hours to write, so I will put them in in the comments. What sorts of things do you think should turn up in productions of the histories (but don't or probably don't)? ALTERNATELY what sorts of things do directors always seem to do that they shouldn't?

Date: 2010-02-15 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lareinenoire.livejournal.com
I agree with all of these. Especially the one about Lady Anne.

Profile

thisengland: (Default)
geeking out on shakespeare's histories

May 2013

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678910 11
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 27th, 2025 05:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios