ext_282685 (
kismekate.livejournal.com) wrote in
thisengland2006-05-14 06:19 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Hey all,
I just recently viewed Henry V for my Shakespeare Class. Interesting, I must say. Actually, a lot different than I had imagined.
Just wanted to know the general consensus on the Kenneth Branagh version of Henry V?
Do you think it stayed true enough to the play?
I sort of felt as though the film's treatment of Henry was a little less ambiguou and looked at him in a more sympathetic manner.
Also, did the movie follow the play exactly? As in, were there any lines left out? I looked for a directors note online, but couldn't seem to find anything.
Any thoughts would be great.
I just recently viewed Henry V for my Shakespeare Class. Interesting, I must say. Actually, a lot different than I had imagined.
Just wanted to know the general consensus on the Kenneth Branagh version of Henry V?
Do you think it stayed true enough to the play?
I sort of felt as though the film's treatment of Henry was a little less ambiguou and looked at him in a more sympathetic manner.
Also, did the movie follow the play exactly? As in, were there any lines left out? I looked for a directors note online, but couldn't seem to find anything.
Any thoughts would be great.
no subject
I know they did cut quite bit out. In particular, I was disappointed that they got rid of much of the "joke" Henry plays on Williams, although I suppose that's back to making Henry seem more sympathetic than perhaps he is.
But I think that this version is more faithful/leaves more in than the Olivier version did.
An open question: is there an obscurer but better film of Henry V?
no subject